It’s not often that a
sitting government’s attempt to massively change the way the UK’s political
system works just passes everybody by without so much as ruffling a few
feathers, especially when it’s a change that will only benefit the party
proposing it.
This week the Coalition
introduced a proposal designed to solve once and for all the curious issue of
the West Lothian Question – that strange quirk of British politics that allows
Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish MPs
to vote on issues that only concern England whereas English MPs cannot vote on
issues that only concern Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The Coalition’s
solution? Ban Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish MPs from voting on issues on
English bills. Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish MPs, otherwise known as half
the parliamentary Labour Party.
Now I’m not saying that
the West Lothian Question doesn’t need solving – though we have managed to get
along without solving it for a very long time – but this isn’t so much a
solution as a partisan attempt by the Conservative party to behead the Labour
party and prevent it from being able to form an effective government ever
again. Under this bill, a Scottish Labour Prime Minister would have been unable
to vote on half the legislation of his own government, as would half his party,
basically rendering his government powerless. You can see who this benefits
can’t you?
If the Conservatives
are serious about dealing with the problem of the West Lothian Question, then
there is a solution that would not only solve it, but benefit them in
perpetuity. Set up a devolved English Parliament. This is an idea that has been
floated before, but dismissed on the grounds that we have already have a
parliament at Westminster and have no need for two. But the success of the
devolved parliament in Scotland and the devolved assemblies in Wales and Northern Ireland have
proved that individual national assemblies or parliaments can work within the
wider Westminster framework.
In fact, I would go one
step further and suggest that we need to follow Germany ’s example. Maybe the time
has come for the United Kingdom to become the
Federated Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland .
Germany , much like the US ,
is made up of sixteen federal states, each with their own leader and their
government, overseen by the Federal Government in Berlin .
Maybe this is what we should do. Strip Westminster
of everything bar foreign policy, tax raising powers and the ability to create
legislative guidelines for the federal assemblies to operate. Everything else
relating to the day to day running of England , Wales , Scotland and Northern Ireland would be handed over to the federal
assemblies. This would solve the West Lothian Question once and for all, and
would also serve to pull the need for independence out from under Scotland ’s feet. If they already have all the powers they
need to run themselves, why become an independent country? It would also
potentially allow us to reduce the number of MPs sent to Westminster ;
though that is something we’d have to look at in more detail.
I won't be pleasing my Scottish, Welsh and Irish independence minded friends in writing this but, as a Cornish autonomist - some would say nationalist - I'd be happy with a federal arrangement giving greater self-determination to Kernow that, of course, we once had anyway via the Duchy and Stannary government.
ReplyDeleteThe Cornish Constitutional Convention: http://www.cornishassembly.org/
First on questions of fact.
ReplyDeleteFirst, the proposal (so far as we know it) does not "Ban Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish MPs from voting on issues on English bills". They can vote at all the normal stages. If the newspaper reports are right, English MPs are to have a right to reject the outcome of those proceedings.
Second, it would not "behead the Labour party and prevent it from being able to form an effective government ever again". All the Blair/Brown governments had an overall majority in England. Only three short-lived Labour governments since the war have not had such a majority, and one of them had no overall majority in the UK either and relied on the Lib/Lab pact.
On matters of opinion, without an English Parliament what is the alternative? For a Labour government without a majority in England to march its Scottish and Welsh members through the lobbies on controversial matters week in, week out against the wishes of English members? How long would the UK last on that basis. Something like this is inevitable if there is not to be a federal UK. And how could there be yet further devolution to Scotland
Lastly, it is already impossible in practice, in the absence of a federal UK, to have another Scottish prime minister.