I would have loved to
have been in the editorial meetings at the Sun and the Daily Star on Thursday.
As the news of Oscar Pistorius and his girlfriend came through the wires, there
must have been intense debate over how best to present the news. A picture of
Pistorius being led away by police perhaps? Or an image of the famous Blade
Runner crossing the finishing line at the Olympics, both captioned with a
perfectly pithy headline?
“Hang on,” someone will
have then said, “She was a supermodel. Why don’t we use a picture of her in a
bikini?”
“Isn’t that a bit
inappropriate?” someone else will have said.
“Nah,” the first guy
will have said, “They are public domain pictures. No harm in using them.”
The problem is that
there is quite a lot of harm in using them. Not only is a young, attractive
woman dead, shot by her world famous boyfriend – and please let the record show
that at no point did either paper, use her name. She was simply “Oscar Pistorius’
girlfriend” – but they were now reducing her to something to be ogled at. Not a
person. Just a body. This is ironic as
the day before the tragedy occurred the Sun was calling out an Italian magazine
for publishing pictures of the Duchess of Cambridge in a bikini.
But all of this is
symptomatic of a larger issue. When a major national newspaper can use topless
models as a unique selling point, we should not at all be surprised when they
pull something like this. In the mass media, it has long been recognised that
sex sells. If you want to sell something to guys, then put a picture of an
attractive woman on the label, and watch it fly off the shelves.
This however means that
we reduce women down to the sum of their parts. What goes on underneath the
surface doesn’t matter. Reeva Steenkampe was not just a body and a pair of
breasts. She was a human being with her own dreams, her own opinions. Yes, she
may have been beautiful, and she may have been a model. But that was not all
that she was.
The media and the world
as a whole, have objectified women, and yet at the same time, call them out
when they dare to dress attractively. We ogle them on Page 3 and yet when a
rape is reported in the news, one of the first comments will usually be that
she was asking for it or should have dressed more decently. We both praise women
for their sexuality and demean them for it.
With the news that
Rupert Murdoch is considering axing Page Three from the Sun, it is possible
that the media has begun to realise that the way we have been portraying women
for so long is no longer appropriate. But when front pages like this are still published, it seems like the message
hasn’t properly sunk in just yet.
The way we have been portraying women has never been appropriate, nor is it a phenomenon exclusive to this century, which is why I don't think the message will ever sink in. Real men will just have to keep averting their eyes and shouldering the verbal abuse and stereotypes from women who believe that all men are pigs. That's the world.
ReplyDelete